Strategic Plan

 

Merrywood Elementary School

 

2011 – 2016

 

Debra K. Green, Principal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“One for All and All for One”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

  1. Strategic Planning Committees

 

  1. Merrywood Mission, Vision, and Beliefs

 

  1. Merrywood Demographic Information

 

  1. Performance Goal 1 – ELA

 

  1. Action Plan – ELA Goal 1 – Strategy 1 & 2

 

  1. Performance Goal 2 – Math

 

  1. Action Plan – Math Goal 2 - Strategy

 

  1. Performance Goal 3 – Teacher/Administrator Quality – Attendance

 

  1. Action Plan – Teacher/Administrator Quality Goal 3 - Strategy

 

  1. Performance Goal 4 –  Teacher/Administrator Quality – Technology

 

  1. Action Plan – Technology Goal 4 - Strategy

 

  1. Performance Goal 5 – School Climate – Volunteers

 

  1. Action Plan – School Climate Goal 5 – Strategy 1 & 2

 

  1. Performance Goal 6 – School Climate – Parent Conferences

 

  1. Action Plan – School Climate Goal 6 - Strategy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Action Plan Committees

 

ELA Action Plan

Mission, Vision, and Beliefs

Wanning, John

Jarrett, Jaime

Boggs, Kristi

Bradberry, Laurie

Driver, Julie

Fennell, Carolyn

Karle, Norma

Fricks, Sheri

Lumley, Ellen

Gambrell, Al

Nizza, Barbara

Hopkins, Carol

Vanderford, Tricia

 

 

 

 

 

School & Community Demographics

Math Action Plan

Davis, Karen

Harris, Ashley

Anderson, Michelle

Moore, Gail

Beckham, Allison

O’Quinn, Katee

Calvert, Dianne

Ramsey, Tara

Carson, Christi

Simpson, Angie

Lee, Dana

 

Riley, Jill

 

Thompson, Donna

 

 

Teacher Quality

 

Tidwell, Angela

School Climate

Anderson, Meg

Schwartz, Chris

Atkins, Ashley

Bacote, Deloris

Evans, Cristy

Morris, April

Leonard, Debbie

Mullikin, Elizabeth

Louden, Ashley

Phillips, Sharon

Mims, Sean

Richardson, Brad

 

Scotland, Michele

Strategic Plan Review

Timmons, Michelle

Buckshorn, David

 

Dorn, Alice

 

Green, Debra

 

Hartung, Sarah

 

Scotland, Michele

 

White, Andrea

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merrywood Elementary School

 

Our Vision

 

We envision Merrywood Elementary School as an enthusiastic community of learners that provides exciting educational experiences to maximize success and achievement.

 

Our Mission Statement

 

The mission of Merrywood Elementary School is to educate students through challenging learning opportunities and provide the LIFESKILLS for responsible and caring citizenship.

 

Our Beliefs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part A — Demographic Overview

 

School and Community Demographic Data

 

     In 2008, Greenwood School District 50 built a new facility for Merrywood Elementary School.  The school is located in the city and the county of Greenwood. 

    Greenwood is the home of Greenwood Mills, Self Regional Hospital, the Genetic Center, Lander University, Piedmont Technical College, Park Seed Company, the Festival of Flowers, and Fujifilm, an international company. According to Greenwood County government statistics, Greenwood’s population is 68,549.  An estimated 32.5% of the county’s residents live in urban areas.

     Merrywood Elementary School qualifies as a school-wide Title 1 School. The percentage of students receiving subsidized meals remained over 50% in 2009-2010.

     The school was given a rating of “Average” on the 2008-2009 School Report Card and met AYP for the academic school year 2008-2009.  The school was awarded the SC Red Carpet Award in 2008-2009 and earned Honorable Mention as a SC Distinguished Title 1 School – Closing the Achievement Gap, 2009-2010.

     The school currently serves students in kindergarten up to fifth grade.  In 2009-2010, the enrollment was 591 students.

    In 2009-2010, Merrywood Elementary School employed forty-four certified staff, eighteen instructional assistants, one registered nurse, one full-time speech therapist, one part-time speech therapist, and a case manager for Merrywood Elementary School.  Three full-time custodians, two part-time custodians, and seven cafeteria operators complete the staff.

     An itinerant staff provided the following student services: ESOL, ABA, occupational therapy, physical therapy, vision services, and psychological testing.

     Parents are involved in meeting various needs for the students and teachers at Merrywood Elementary School.  In addition to serving on the School Improvement Council, the Title 1 Committee, and PTO, parents serve as volunteers in the classrooms, the Media Center, and various school-wide events.

 

 

 

 

     The following demographic data was gathered from the 2009-2010 academic school year.

 

 

Gender

Grade Level

Male

Female

Total

Kindergarten

64

42

106

1st grade

58

41

99

2nd grade

46

41

87

3rd grade

60

47

107

4th grade

60

52

112

5th grade

40

40

80

Totals

328

263

591

 

 

Ethnicity

Grade Level

African-American

White

Other

Total

Kindergarten

42

54

10

106

1st grade

33

60

6

99

2nd grade

37

41

9

87

3rd grade

40

53

14

107

4th grade

46

50

16

112

5th grade

24

52

4

80

Totals

222

310

59

591

 

 

Demographic Data (in percentages)

Year

African American

White

Hispanic

Asian

Other

Free and Reduced Lunch

Number of Students

2009-2010

38

52

8

1

2

60

591

 

*The total percentage for ethnicities does not equal 100% due to rounding.

 

 

Part B - Needs Assessment

 

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Quality of Education

 

     This section of the School Improvement Plan contains perceptions of stakeholders regarding their satisfaction in the quality of education provided by the staff of Merrywood Elementary School.

     Data was gathered from the results of the annual State Department of Education survey taken by the stakeholders. In this report, the stakeholders are eighty-nine of the 2009-2010 fifth grade students, fifty-three parents of the fifth grade students, and forty-three teachers of Merrywood Elementary School

 

Student Survey

    The table below shows the percentage of satisfaction with the learning environment, the social and physical environments, and the school-home relations.

 

Percentage of Students Who Agree

Survey Question

Percentage

Percent satisfied with the learning environment

83.5

Percent satisfied with the social and physical environment

86.6

Percent satisfied with school-home relations

82.5

 

Parent Survey

      Over 90% of the fifty-three returned surveys indicated that the learning environment, the social and physical environments, and the home-school relations are satisfactory.

 

Percentage of Parents Who Agree

Survey Question

Percentage

Percent satisfied with the learning environment

92.9

Percent satisfied with the social and physical environment

90.1

Percent satisfied with school-home relations

90.1

 

Teacher Survey

     All teachers surveyed agreed that the learning environment at Merrywood Elementary School is exemplary. The majority of those surveyed is satisfied with the physical and social environments and the school-home relations.

 

Percentage of Teachers Who Agree

Survey Question

Percentage

Percent satisfied with the learning environment

100

Percent satisfied with the social and physical environment

97.7

Percent satisfied with school-home relations

97.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part – C Student Achievement

 

PASS Performance Data

 

     This section of the School Improvement Plan provides disaggregated student performance data provided by 2009 PASS test results.  Teachers studied the performance data as a grade level, as members of Action Plan committees, and as an entire faculty.  Student population was compared by sub-group performance to identify areas of strength and weakness in ELA (English Language Arts) and Math.

     The data below are the percentages of students who scored Not Met, Met, and Exemplary in the areas of ELA and Math in a sub-group of race population by year and by grade level.

   

PASS 2009 - ELA

 

                                                 Total Population by Year

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

19.9

37.2

42.9

 

 

                                                White Population by Year

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

8.5

32.4

59.2

 

                     White Population by Grade Level

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

23

29

48

4

20.5

38.6

13.9

5

16

44.7

39.4

 

African-American Population by Year

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

31.6

43

25.4

 

 

 

 African American Population by Grade Level

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

39.5

33.3

27

4

44.4

40.7

14.8

5

30.9

47.6

21.4

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

PASS 2009 - Math

 

Total Population by Year

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

26.2

45

28.7

 

 

White Population by Year

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

10.6

45.1

44.4

 

White Population by Grade Level

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

9

36.3

54.5

4

15

41.5

43.3

5

10.4

54.1

35.4

 

 

                                        African American Population by Year

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

43

44.7

12.3

 

                                   African American Population by Grade Level

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

62.5

27

10.4

4

40.7

44.4

14.8

5

40.4

50

9.5

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    The data below are the percentages of students who scored Not Met, Met, and Exemplary in the areas of ELA and Math in a sub-group of students receiving subsidized lunch (free or reduced) or full pay lunch by year and by grade level.

 

 

PASS 2009 - ELA

 

Full Pay Population by Year

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

8.9

30.8

60.1

 

Full Pay Population by Grade Level

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

8.1

16.2

75.6

4

13.3

35.5

51.1

5

4.8

39

56

 

   Free / Reduced Pay Population by Year

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

27.6

42.3

30.1

 

Free / Reduced Pay Population by Grade Level

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

34.2

35.7

30

4

31.1

42.2

26.6

5

29

43.6

27.2

 

 

PASS 2009 - Math

 

                                                           Full Pay Population by Year

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

11.3

39.8

48.7

                                      

                                                     Full Pay Population by Grade Level

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

5.4

37.8

56.7

4

17.7

35.5

46.6

5

9.7

54.5

9.0

 

 

Free / Reduced Population by Year

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

38

49.1

12.9

 

Free / Reduced Population by Grade Level

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

54.2

31.4

14.2

4

33.3

48.8

17.7

5

36.3

54.5

9

 

 

    The data below are the percentages of students who scored Not Met, Met, and Exemplary in the areas of ELA and Math in a sub-group of student gender by year and by grade level.

 

                                  

PASS 2009 - ELA

 

                                                  Male Population by Year

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

23.8

34.3

42

                               

                                             Male Population by Grade Level

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

25

31.1

44.2

4

31.7

39

29.2

5

21.2

34

44.6

 

                                                  Female Population by Year

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

15.8

40.3

43.9

 

                                          Female Population by Grade Level

ELA

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

26

26

47.8

4

14.2

38.7

46.9

5

16.3

48.9

34.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PASS 2009 - Math

                                                 

Male Population by Year

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

25.2

43.4

31.5

 

  Male Population by Grade Level

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

34.4

32.7

32.7

4

29.2

39

31.7

5

23.4

51

25.5

 

   Female Population by Year  

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

2009

27.3

46.8

25.9

 

   Female Population by Grade Level

Math

Not Met

Met

Exemplary

3

41.3

34.7

23.9

4

22.4

44.8

32.6

5

26.5

51

22.4

 

    

    From the preceding data, the faculty concluded that a large percentage of our African American students and students receiving subsidized lunch are in the Not Met and Met categories.

 

 

    The faculty identified areas of academic strengths and weaknesses in the student population of Merrywood Elementary School which provided a gauge for developing goals in ELA and Math for the academic school years 2011-2016.

 

 
          

 

 

 

 


 

SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN FOR  Merrywood Elementary School                                                       DATE: 2011 – 2016

Performance Goal Area: ELA

Student Achievement       Teacher/Administrator Quality      

School Climate (Parent Involvement, Safe and Healthy Schools, etc.)     

 Other (optional)

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL:

(desired result of student learning)

By 2015–2016, 100% of our students in grades 3-5 will meet standard in ELA as measured by the PASS assessment.

 

INTERIM PERFORMANCE GOAL: (annual)

 

By 2010-2011, 85.1% of students in grades 3-5 will meet standard in ELA as measured by PASS assessment.

 

 

DATA SOURCE(S):

 

PASS scores, enrollment data, AIMS web data, MAP, common formative assessment, teacher evaluation information

Updates will be made when 2010 data is available.

 

 

OVERALL MEASURES:

PASS scores, enrollment data, AIMS web data, MAP, common formative assessment, teacher evaluation information

 

 

Average Baseline

2010-2011

             2011-2012

 

2012-2013

2013-2014

2014-2015

2015-2016

82.8%

85.1%

87.7%

90.3%

93%

95.8%

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION PLAN

EVALUATION

 

 

STRATEGY 1:  Increase the percentage of students scoring met and exemplary on PASS ELA.

 

Activity

 

(List the processes to fully implement the strategy. Include professional development, scientifically based research, academic assistance, innovation initiatives, parent involvement, technology, etc.)

 

 

Timeline Start/End Date

 

Person

Responsible

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

Cost

 

 

 

Funding

Source

Measures of Success/Indicators of Implementation

(Formative measures used to assess impact of strategies and activities on improvement)

 

 

Continue to train teachers in grades K-5 in Balanced Literacy to strengthen the reading program.  Provide teachers with extra collaborative time.

 

 

 

Continue training in Writer’s Workshop in order to provide a consistent school-wide writing program.

 

 

Update technology training (Smartboard, Video Streaming educational websites) to effectively enhance instruction.

 

 

 

 2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal &

Instructional Specialist

 

 

 

 

Principal & Instructional Specialist

 

School Technology Leader & Media Specialist

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

District Funds

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attendance log

Principal observation

forms, Guided Reading/SRA Lesson Checks, MAP data & PASS results

 

Attendance log, Principal observation & PASS results

 

Attendance logs, Principal observation & PASS results

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION PLAN

 

EVALUATION

 

 

STRATEGY 2: Utilize professional learning community structures at all levels to improve academic success.

 

Activity

(List the processes to fully implement the strategy. Include professional development, scientifically based research, academic assistance, innovation initiatives, parent involvement, technology, etc.)

 

Timeline Start/End Date

 

Person

Responsible

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

Cost

 

 

 

Funding

Source

Measures of Success/Indicators of Implementation

(Formative measures used to assess impact of strategies and activities on improvement)

 

 

Utilize research-based essential standards and develop pacing guides for ELA.

 

 

 

Continue to meet in grade level meetings (Professional Learning Community) and analyze all data to provided differentiated instruction, varied academic support/services to insure success of all students.  

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

Principal & Instructional Specialist

 

 

Grade Level Chair &

Administrative Staff

 

$0

 

 

 

 

$0

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

Oncourse Lesson Plans &

Grade Level Meeting

Agendas

Grade Level Meeting Agendas & Data Room

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN FOR  Merrywood Elementary School                                                                    DATE: 2011-2016

Performance Goal Area: Math

 

Student Achievement       Teacher/Leadership Quality      

School Climate (Parent Involvement, Safe and Healthy Schools, etc.)     

 Other (optional)

 

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL:

(desired result of student learning)

 

 

By May, 2016, 100% of our students in grades 3-5 will meet standard in Math as measured by the PASS assessment.

 

INTERIM PERFORMANCE GOAL: (annual)

 

 

By 2010-2011, 76.3% of students in grades 3-5 will meet standard in math as measured by the PASS assessment.

 

DATA SOURCE(S):

 

PASS data (holistic and subgroups), MAP data, Accelerated Math data, common informative assessments followed by flexible groupings and enrollment information.

 

 

OVERALL MEASURES:

Grades 3 – 5 PASS MATH percentages of students scoring met or above.

 

      Average

      Baseline

 

2011

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

                80.5%

 

86.1%

 

88.9%

 

91.7%

 

94.5%

 

100%

 

 

 

ACTION PLAN

EVALUATION

 

STRATEGY:  Increase the percentage of students scoring Met or Above on PASS Math

 

Activity

 

(List the processes to fully implement the strategy. Include professional development, scientifically based research, academic assistance, innovation initiatives, parent involvement, technology, etc.)

 

 

Timeline Start/End Date

 

Person

Responsible

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

Cost

 

 

 

Funding

Source

Measures of Success/Indicators of Implementation

(Formative measures used to assess impact of strategies and activities on improvement)

 

 

Establish individual goals and monitor student achievement through student/teacher and parent/teacher conferences utilizing FASTT Math, PASS, MAP, and Accelerated Math.

       

 

Provide remediation for students through small group instruction, volunteer efforts, and tutorial websites.

 

 

Enrich math instruction through teacher observations, the Gifted and Talented program, Brain Boosters, small group instruction, flexible grouping, the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, and the annual Family Math and Science nights.

 

 

Utilize research – based instructional strategies and manipulatives to plan and implement instruction.

 

 

 

 

Provide opportunities for collaboration through Professional Learning Communities (PLC).

 

 

 

 

 

Use technology to effectively enhance instruction.

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

Classroom teachers & Instructional Specialist

 

 

Classroom teachers & Instructional Specialist

 

Classroom teachers, GT Instructor, Instructional Specialist & the Principal

 

Classroom teachers & Instructional Specialist

 

 

 

Classroom teachers, Instructional Specialist, & the Principal

 

 

Classroom teachers

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

Conference logs, FASTT Math reports, PASS scores, MAP scores, & Accelerated Math

 

Lesson plans, schedules, volunteer sign-in report

 

 

Lesson Plans & Schedules

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson plans & Student data

 

 

 

 

 

PLC attendance log and meeting minutes

 

 

 

 

 

Lesson plans & student data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN FOR  Merrywood Elementary School                               DATE:  2011 - 2016

Performance Goal Area: Teacher/Administrator Quality (Attendance)

 

Student Achievement       Teacher/Administrator Quality   

School Climate (Parent Involvement, Safe and Healthy Schools, etc.)     

 Other (optional)

 

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL:

(desired result of student learning)

 

By 2016, Merrywood Elementary School will recruit and retain highly qualified, technologically competent, and diverse personnel to implement the school’s mission statement as measured by the State Department’s Accreditation Report, the Computer Proficiency Report, NCLB criteria, and school’s retention rate.   By 2016, teachers’ attendance rate will be at 95.5%.

 

 

INTERIM PERFORMANCE GOAL: (annual)

 

 

By the academic school year 2010-2011, teachers’ attendance rate will be 93%.

 

DATA SOURCE(S):

 

Annual District Report Card and Merrywood Elementary School’s Annual Report to Parents

 

OVERALL MEASURES:

Annual District and School Report Card

 

Average Baseline

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

 

2016

 

 

92.5%

 

93%

 

93.5%

 

94%

 

94.5%

 

95%

 

95.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION PLAN

EVALUATION

 

STRATEGY: Increase the attendance rate of teachers.

 

Activity

(List the processes to fully implement the strategy. Include professional development, scientifically based research, academic assistance, innovation initiatives, parent involvement, technology, etc.)

 

 

Timeline

 

Start/End Date

 

Person

Responsible

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

Cost

 

 

 

Funding

Source

Measures of Success/Indicators of Implementation

(Formative measures used to assess impact of strategies and activities on improvement)

 

Provide perfect attendance    motivation through media recognition and monthly drawings.

 

Offer annual healthcare screenings through Prevention Partners.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

Principal

 

 

 

 

School Nurse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Community Donations

 

 

 

$15.00/ person  

 

Business Partners & Community Leaders

 

Participants

 

Attendance records

 

 

 

 

Registration sheets provided by school nurse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN FOR Merrywood Elementary School                                                                DATE:  2011-2016

Performance Goal Area: Teacher / Administrator Quality (Technology)

 

Student Achievement       Teacher/Administrator Quality      

School Climate (Parent Involvement, Safe and Healthy Schools, etc.)   

District Priority

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL:

(desired result of student learning)

 

By 2016, Merrywood Elementary School will recruit and retain highly qualified, technologically

competent, and diverse personnel to implement the school’s mission statement as measured by

the State Department’s Accreditation Report, the Computer Proficiency Report, NCLB criteria,

and school’s retention rate.

 

 

INTERIM PERFORMANCE GOAL:

 

Increase technology proficiency of certified staff five percent yearly.

 

DATA SOURCE(S):

 

State Technology Proficiency Report, lesson plan monitoring, and classroom observations

 by the Principal.

 

OVERALL MEASURES:

State Technology Proficiency Report, lesson plan monitoring, and classroom observations by the principal.

 

Average Baseline

2011*

2012*

2013*

2014*

2015*

2016*

 

69%

 

74%

 

79%

 

84%

 

89%

 

94%

 

99%

* Represents projections of improvement

 

 

 

ACTION PLAN

EVALUATION

 

STRATEGY:  Assist all teachers in accomplishing proficiency in technology as required by the district.

Activity

 

(List the processes to fully implement the strategy. Include professional development, scientifically based research, academic assistance, innovation initiatives, parent involvement, technology, etc.)

 

 

Timeline Start/End Date

 

Person

Responsible

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

Cost

 

 

 

Funding

Source

Measures of Success/Indicators of Implementation

(Formative measures used to assess impact of strategies and activities on improvement)

 

Provide assistance to teachers in completing district requirements in proficiency of technology.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provide information and training on the use of progressive technology in order to provide effective classroom instruction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

School Technology Leader, Instructional Technology Specialist, & Office of Computing Services

 

School Technology Leader

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proficiency online assessment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oncourse lesson plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN FOR Merrywood Elementary School                                                                DATE: 2011-2016

Performance Goal Area: School Climate

 

Student Achievement       Teacher/Administrator Quality      

School Climate (Parent Involvement, Safe and Healthy Schools, etc.)    

 District Priority

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL:

Community and Parent Involvement

 

Merrywood Elementary School will increase parental involvement and communication as measured by participation and documentation of activities and events.

 

INTERIM PERFORMANCE GOAL: Annual

 

Merrywood Elementary School will increase the total number of daily school volunteers by two percent in

2010-2011.

DATA SOURCE(S):

 

Volunteer Application forms

Volunteer sign-in sheets (School Check-In)

Certificate of Agreement

 

OVERALL MEASURES:

Total number of volunteers as documented by volunteer sign-in register.

Average Baseline

2011*

2012*

2013*

2014*

2015*

2016*

 

486

 

496

 

516

 

526

 

537

 

548

 

575

* Represents projections of improvement

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION PLAN

EVALUATION

STRATEGY 2: Increase community volunteer involvement.

 

Timeline     Start/End Date

Person Responsible

Estimated Cost

Funding Source

Indicators of Implementation

Activity

(List the processes to fully implement the strategy. Include professional development, scientifically based research, academic assistance, innovation initiatives, parent involvement, technology etc.)

 

(Formative measures used to assess impact of strategies and activities on improvement)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Strengthen relationship with current business partners.

 

 

 

 

Adopt new business partners.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coordinate partnership recognition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public relations, the Principal, and Hospitality Committee

 

Public relations, the Principal, and Hospitality Committee

 

 

Public relations, the Principal, and Hospitality Committee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $0

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 N/A

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teacher survey on effectiveness of volunteers and the impact on student achievement

 

 

Teacher survey on effectiveness of volunteers and the impact on student achievement

 

 

 

Teacher survey on effectiveness of volunteers and the impact on student achievement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN FOR Merrywood Elementary School                                                                DATE: 2011-2016

Performance Goal Area: School Climate

 

Student Achievement       Teacher/Administrator Quality      

School Climate (Parent Involvement, Safe and Healthy Schools, etc.)      

District Priority

 

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL:

Community/Parent Involvement

 

Merrywood Elementary School will increase community/parent involvement as well as communication as measured by participation and documentation of school activities and events.

 

INTERIM PERFORMANCE GOAL:

 

Merrywood Elementary School will increase the number of parents attending conferences in 2010-2011 by two percent as reported in the SC Report Card.

 

DATA SOURCE(S):

 

State Department of Education survey and the annual school report card

OVERALL MEASURES:

State Department of Education survey and the annual school report card

Average Baseline

2011*

2012*

2013*

2014*

2015*

2016*

 

88%

 

90%

 

92%

 

94%

 

96%

 

98%

 

100%

* Represents projections of improvement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION PLAN

EVALUATION

STRATEGY: Diversify communication with parents by enhancing and expanding communication tools and channels.

 

Timeline     Start/End Date

Person Responsible

Estimated Cost

Funding Source

Indicators of Implementation

Activity

 

(List the processes to fully implement the strategy. Include professional development, scientifically based research, academic assistance, innovation initiatives, parent involvement, technology etc.)

 

 

 

(Formative measures used to assess impact of strategies and activities on improvement)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyze the effectiveness of the current communication tools in the school and make necessary changes.

 

 

 

 

Collaborate with parents and expand communication of school activities.

 

 

 

Enhance new outreach opportunities such as websites, mass callings, instructional calendars, newsletters, and local media.

 

 

 

 2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

2011-2016

 

 

 

 

 

Principal and teacher committee

 

 

 

 

Principal and SIC committee

 

 

 

Principal and Instructional Specialist.

 

 

 

 $0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

 

 

 N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

Parent survey asking

which communication

tools and channels

impacted

their attendance at conferences.

 

               

Parent Survey

 

 

 

Parent Survey